It is not clear why BioLib has declared this to be not part of the BioLib taxonomic system. Both The Taxonomicon & Systema Naturae 2000 and http://www.taxapad.com/ show this to be a valid subfamily with numerous tribus and genera. Some of these genera have been assigned by BioLib to other subfamilies, uncertain placement or just non-existent. BioLib administrators should reconsider re-instating subfamily Labeninae as valid or provide other authorities to show why this subfamily is not valid. Thanks