CZ EN
SEARCH  

Taxon profile

genus

Plutella Schrank, 1802

kingdom Animalia - animals »  phylum Arthropoda - arthropods »  class Insecta - insects »  order Lepidoptera - butterflies and moths »  family Plutellidae - diamondback moths

Scientific synonyms

Anadetia Hübner, 1825
Creagria Sodoffsky, 1837
Euota Hübner, 1825
Evota Agassiz, 1847
Cerostoma Latreille, 1802 sensu Stephens, 1834 (misidentification) M

Included taxa

Number of records: 20

species Plutella albidorsella Walsingham, 1881
species Plutella armoraciae Busck, 1912
species Plutella australiana Landry & Hebert, 2013
species Plutella copaquillaensis Vargas. 2024
species Plutella dryoxyla Meyrick, 1932
species Plutella geniatella Zeller, 1839
species Plutella haasi Staudinger, 1883 - Arctic Diamond-back
species Plutella huemerella (Baraniak, 2007)
species Plutella hyperboreella Strand, 1902
species Plutella karsholtella Baraniak, 2007
species Plutella kyrkella (Baraniak, 2007)
species Plutella mariae Rebel, 1923
species Plutella notabilis Busck, 1904
species Plutella omissa Walsingham, 1889
species Plutella oxylopha Meyrick, 1932
species Plutella polaris Zeller, 1880
species Plutella porrectella (Linnaeus, 1758) - Grey-streaked Diamond-back
species Plutella stichocentra Meyrick, 1932
species Plutella vanella Walsingham, 1881
species Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus, 1758) - Diamond-back Moth

Plutella xylostella


Links and literature

EN Australian Faunal Directory [b9140cb8-aa53-4b6c-a41f-03fa12794e48]

ABRS (2009-2019): Australian Faunal Directory [https://biodiversity.org.au/afd/home], Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra [as Plutella Schrank, 1802]
Data retrieved on: 5 February 2014
EN The Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera [1378784]

Rees, T. (compiler): The Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera [https://www.irmng.org] [as Plutella Schrank, 1802]
Data retrieved on: 30 November 2019

Contributions to BioLib

Help us to expand this encyclopedia! If you are logged in, you can add new subtaxa, vernacular and scientific names, texts, images or intertaxon relationships for this taxon.

Comments


Explanations

M taxon was incorrectly identified in certain scientific works